Bill DeWitt wrote:
> You seem to be talking about animation, since
> this is a still image group I didn't expect that.

No, I'm talking about still images.  In order to
make pose Z which is somewhere between poses A
and B, you can either stretch they daylights out
of pose A, or you can average the datasets of A
and B.

> Realism in movement probably takes tedium and
> skill, realism in static poses takes texture
> mapping and Giles can probably help you with that.

Texture mapping?  Look at the attached image.  I
don't care WHAT texture you slap on it, it's not
going to look right; the geometry is flat out
wrong.

(Realism in movement takes a few hundred thousand
dollars to afford a motion capture system, then
the know-how to clean up the end data...unless
you have a lot of time on your hands and really
detailed knowledge of anatomy)
-- 
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.scifi-fantasy.com

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'junk.jpg' (19 KB)

Preview of image 'junk.jpg'